HostGBACK vs PONS — price, size and safety, side by side
GBACK (Solana) vs PONS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GBACK vs PONS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| GBACK | PONS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005903 | $0.5947 |
| Market cap | $6.41M | $1.11M |
| 24h volume | $6.21K | $500.27K |
| Liquidity | $130.68K | $130.43K |
| FDV | $6.41M | $1.11M |
| Holders | 3,541 | 5,289 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GBACK measures ~5.8× the market cap of PONS
- PONS measures ~81× the 24h volume of GBACK
- over the shared window GBACK moved +3.49% while PONS moved −18.8%
What the data says
GBACK
GIVEBACK — GBACK on Solana, mint Fh7mLxtPAysdvHcMcJ37A3vc6WvBVh7JVDwxmwk6pump — carries $6.4 million of market cap across 3,541 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot — roughly $1,383 of cap per wallet, a mid-heavy file.
The name is the pitch and the page's caution in one word: "give back" is the claim made by every reflexive-rewards and charity-themed token — value flows back to holders, somehow, eventually. What the data can verify is a market: $131 thousand of liquidity — thin at ~2% of the cap — and ~$15 thousand of daily volume. Mint and freeze revoked.
PONS
Pons — the frog-themed community token that brands itself around "the Ponse" — on Solana at mint poNSfquKq512ApeYjVghwViSun4x1MhCqHVH2Paq4jN (a vanity mint; cosmetic, not meaningful). The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $130 thousand of liquidity, a market cap near $1.1 million, and roughly 5,289 holders.
The meme-token baseline applies: no cash flows, no redemption, value is narrative and community. By meme standards the numbers are middle-aged — real liquidity, modest distribution, a cap that prices the community's current belief rather than anything measurable underneath.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GBACK or PONS?
By tracked market cap: GBACK (Solana) measures $6.41M and PONS (Solana) measures $1.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GBACK or PONS?
On the contract checks we publish: GBACK (Solana) grades A and PONS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GBACK and PONS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show GBACK at +3.49% and PONS at −18.8%.
More comparisons
MAGIC vs GBACKGBACK vs BITTYNST vs GBACKGOR vs GBACKPONS vs BITTYMAGIC vs PONSNST vs PONSPONS vs BMT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.