HostLAVA vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
LAVA (Arbitrum) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LAVA vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| LAVA | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01349 | $0.4887 |
| Market cap | $8.18M | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $13.56K | $21.37K |
| Liquidity | $331.36K | $213.78K |
| FDV | $2.75M | $8.18M |
| Holders | 4,745 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 286 | 832 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- LAVA measures ~1.5× the liquidity of GNS
- GNS measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of LAVA
- GNS measures ~3.0× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window LAVA moved −1.44% while GNS moved +10.7%
What the data says
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAVA or GNS?
By tracked market cap: LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAVA or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAVA and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show LAVA at −1.44% and GNS at +10.7%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs LAVALAVA vs XBTLAVA vs MSUSDLVMON vs LAVAGNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.