HostRENDER vs LAVA — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs LAVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
RENDER vs LAVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| RENDER | LAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.02 | $0.01349 |
| Market cap | $933.19M | $8.18M |
| 24h volume | $599.42K | $13.56K |
| Liquidity | $331.88K | $331.36K |
| FDV | $933.19M | $2.75M |
| Holders | 125,921 | 4,745 |
| Age (days) | — | 286 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~114× the market cap of LAVA
- RENDER measures ~44× the 24h volume of LAVA
- RENDER measures ~27× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window RENDER moved +8.43% while LAVA moved −1.44%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or LAVA?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M and LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or LAVA?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and LAVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show RENDER at +8.43% and LAVA at −1.44%.
More comparisons
LVMON vs RENDERRENDER vs XBTRENDER vs MSUSDCBLTC vs RENDERLAVA vs XBTLAVA vs MSUSDLVMON vs LAVACBLTC vs LAVA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.