HostGNS vs CBZEC — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs CBZEC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GNS vs CBZEC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GNS | CBZEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $1.56K |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $4.48M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $1.67M |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $213.73K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $4.47M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 2,417 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 20 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~2.6× the market cap of CBZEC
- CBZEC measures ~78× the 24h volume of GNS
- GNS measures ~5.8× the holder count of CBZEC
- over the shared window GNS moved +9.30% while CBZEC moved +2.33%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
CBZEC
cbZEC at 0xb2000000000000000000008501b13360000cb2ec — Coinbase Wrapped ZEC — is the exchange-issued wrapped claim on Zcash on Base, just 20 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $4.5 million market cap across 2.9 thousand units.
The launch book is workable and the tape is hot: $213.7 thousand of tracked depth on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling eight times daily, a real trading book under a young float. What the snapshot cannot say is what the custody is worth: a wrapped claim's backing lives in the issuer's reserve, not on-chain at this address.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or CBZEC?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and CBZEC (Base) measures $4.48M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or CBZEC?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and CBZEC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and CBZEC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GNS at +9.30% and CBZEC at +2.33%.
More comparisons
GNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNSGNS vs LINKCBZEC vs NESTCBZEC vs DRAMCBZEC vs LINKARB vs CBZEC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.