HostARB vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
ARB (Arbitrum) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ARB vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| ARB | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.232 | $0.4887 |
| Market cap | $1.57B | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $10.56M | $21.37K |
| Liquidity | $2.92M | $213.78K |
| FDV | $2.32B | $8.18M |
| Holders | 2,386,770 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 1,284 | 832 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- ARB measures ~136× the market cap of GNS
- ARB measures ~14× the liquidity of GNS
- ARB measures ~494× the 24h volume of GNS
- ARB measures ~169× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window ARB moved +0.14% while GNS moved +10.7%
What the data says
ARB
ARB is Arbitrum's own token — the governance asset of the largest Ethereum L2, the chain most of this index's Arbitrum-side liquidity actually lives on. The deployment 0x912ce59144191c1204e64559fe8253a0e49e6548 is the canonical mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $2.9 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest asymmetry: ARB's market value rides on the chain it governs being worth governing — the token's thesis is Arbitrum's sequencer revenue, its DAO treasury, and the chain's continued dominance in L2 DeFi, none of which a liquidity snapshot can confirm or deny. What the snapshot does show is that ARB's on-chain depth is concentrated and modest relative to the chain's own TVL — most ARB trades happen off-chain or on the chain's own DEX infrastructure in pairs this index doesn't fully see.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARB or GNS?
By tracked market cap: ARB (Arbitrum) measures $1.57B and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARB or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: ARB (Arbitrum) grades B and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARB and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show ARB at +0.14% and GNS at +10.7%.
More comparisons
ARB vs WBTCARB vs USD0MANEKI vs ARBARB vs CATEGNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMGNS vs LINK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.