HostGNS vs DRAM — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs DRAM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNS vs DRAM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GNS | DRAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4887 | $62.99 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $924.49K |
| 24h volume | $21.37K | $443.17K |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $212.62K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $924.49K |
| Holders | 14,134 | 1,821 |
| Age (days) | 832 | — |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~13× the market cap of DRAM
- DRAM measures ~21× the 24h volume of GNS
- GNS measures ~7.8× the holder count of DRAM
- over the shared window GNS moved +10.7% while DRAM moved +2.47%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
DRAM
A tokenized representation of the Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) under Backpack Securities — an exchange-traded fund concentrated in memory-chip names (Micron and its peers). Mint DRAMjSWR7HRfJKjRkvQWYL2bcaejaVhuxEcjf4pAY4Cw; the September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $213 thousand of liquidity and roughly 1,821 holders.
Synthetic-ETF anatomy, same as the stock wrappers: issuer custody anchors the token to the real ETF price; no shares, votes, or fund protections; 24/7 on-chain settlement.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or DRAM?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and DRAM (Solana) measures $924.49K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or DRAM?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and DRAM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and DRAM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GNS at +10.7% and DRAM at +2.47%.
More comparisons
GNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTARB vs GNSGNS vs LINKNEST vs DRAMDRAM vs LINKCBZEC vs DRAMDRAM vs MOBY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.