HostCTM vs DEBIT — price, size and safety, side by side
CTM (Ethereum) vs DEBIT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CTM vs DEBIT — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CTM | DEBIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2599 | $2.01 |
| Market cap | $1.06B | $34.70M |
| 24h volume | $1.89M | $49.89M |
| Liquidity | $1.76M | $1.19M |
| FDV | $77.01M | $201.49M |
| Holders | 4,956 | 14,209 |
| Age (days) | 174 | 28 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- CTM measures ~31× the market cap of DEBIT
- DEBIT measures ~26× the 24h volume of CTM
- DEBIT measures ~2.9× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window CTM moved −3.14% while DEBIT moved −27.4%
What the data says
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
DEBIT
DEBIT — trading under the project name Teller on BNB Smart Chain, at 0x66661c7229901f568f16bd1551b3ba826f83ce49 — shows $1.2 million of liquidity and roughly $19.2 million of 24-hour volume in the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two things want separating here. The name: "Teller" is associated with a lending protocol that has operated across chains, and a DEBIT symbol on BSC is not automatically that project — the address above is the identity, and any claim of protocol lineage needs verifying at the contract, not the ticker. The numbers: near 7x daily turnover against liquidity is hot speculation by any standard, whatever the project behind it is.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTM or DEBIT?
By tracked market cap: CTM (Ethereum) measures $1.06B and DEBIT (BNB Chain) measures $34.70M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTM or DEBIT?
On the contract checks we publish: CTM (Ethereum) grades B and DEBIT (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTM and DEBIT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CTM at −3.14% and DEBIT at −27.4%.
More comparisons
CTM vs LINKDAI vs CTMCTM vs CRCLXWNEAR vs CTMDEBIT vs DORYH vs DEBITDEBIT vs PENDLEDEBIT vs ALUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.