HostCTM vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
CTM (Ethereum) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
CTM vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CTM | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2599 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $1.06B | $9.76B |
| 24h volume | $1.89M | $2.58M |
| Liquidity | $1.76M | $24.03M |
| FDV | $77.01M | $13.05B |
| Holders | 4,956 | 919,439 |
| Age (days) | 174 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~9.2× the market cap of CTM
- LINK measures ~14× the liquidity of CTM
- LINK measures ~186× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window CTM moved −0.99% while LINK moved +14.4%
What the data says
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTM or LINK?
By tracked market cap: CTM (Ethereum) measures $1.06B and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTM or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: CTM (Ethereum) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTM and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CTM at −0.99% and LINK at +14.4%.
More comparisons
DAI vs CTMCTM vs CRCLXWNEAR vs CTMCTM vs ZEREBROLINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.