HostCTM vs ZEREBRO — price, size and safety, side by side
CTM (Ethereum) vs ZEREBRO (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CTM vs ZEREBRO — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CTM | ZEREBRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2599 | $0.03335 |
| Market cap | $1.06B | $33.21M |
| 24h volume | $1.89M | $156.11K |
| Liquidity | $1.76M | $1.68M |
| FDV | $77.01M | $33.21M |
| Holders | 4,956 | 51,377 |
| Age (days) | 174 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CTM measures ~32× the market cap of ZEREBRO
- CTM measures ~12× the 24h volume of ZEREBRO
- ZEREBRO measures ~10× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window CTM moved −0.99% while ZEREBRO moved −10.8%
What the data says
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
ZEREBRO
ZEREBRO is a Solana AI-agent token — an autonomous-agent project from the wave that followed GOAT, built around an AI that generates content and operates on-chain. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $33.2 million across 51,377 wallets on mint 8x5VqbHA8D7NkD52uNuS5nnt3PwA8pLD34ymskeSo2Wn.
AI-agent tokens price on narrative plus demonstrable autonomy — the agent's actual output is the product surface, and attention to it is the demand. ZEREBRO was among the cycle's recognized names, which means its chart carries the whole arc of that trade's enthusiasm and cooling.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTM or ZEREBRO?
By tracked market cap: CTM (Ethereum) measures $1.06B and ZEREBRO (Solana) measures $33.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTM or ZEREBRO?
On the contract checks we publish: CTM (Ethereum) grades B and ZEREBRO (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTM and ZEREBRO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CTM at −0.99% and ZEREBRO at −10.8%.
More comparisons
CTM vs LINKDAI vs CTMCTM vs CRCLXWNEAR vs CTMZEREBRO vs WETHZEREBRO vs FBTCZEREBRO vs USDUCRCLX vs ZEREBRO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.