HostWNEAR vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
WNEAR (Solana) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WNEAR vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WNEAR | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.20 | $0.2599 |
| Market cap | $9.68M | $1.06B |
| 24h volume | $8.60M | $1.89M |
| Liquidity | $1.81M | $1.76M |
| FDV | $9.68M | $77.01M |
| Holders | 12,281 | 4,956 |
| Age (days) | — | 174 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CTM measures ~110× the market cap of WNEAR
- WNEAR measures ~4.6× the 24h volume of CTM
- WNEAR measures ~2.5× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window WNEAR moved +113% while CTM moved −0.99%
What the data says
WNEAR
WNEAR is NEAR's token wrapped onto Solana — native NEAR locked on its own chain, a claim receipt trading here. The mint 3ZLekZYq2qkZiSpnSvabjit34tUkjSwD1JFuW9as9wBG is what our scan tracks: $9.7 million market cap, $1.8 million of pool liquidity, 12,281 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest mechanics of any wrapped asset: your exposure is NEAR's price plus the wrapper's integrity — a bridge or custodian sits between this token and the real asset, and bridge-layer failures are where wrapped tokens die. The mcap-vs-liquidity ratio is reasonable; the honest sizing question is the wrapper, not the chain.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNEAR or CTM?
By tracked market cap: WNEAR (Solana) measures $9.68M and CTM (Ethereum) measures $1.06B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNEAR or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: WNEAR (Solana) grades A and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNEAR and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WNEAR at +113% and CTM at −0.99%.
More comparisons
WNEAR vs DAINEET vs WNEAR牛来 vs WNEARALCH vs WNEARCTM vs LINKDAI vs CTMCTM vs CRCLXCTM vs ZEREBRO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.