HostDEBIT vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
DEBIT (BNB Chain) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
DEBIT vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| DEBIT | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.01 | $2.64 |
| Market cap | $34.70M | $457.55M |
| 24h volume | $49.89M | $1.20M |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $3.40M |
| FDV | $201.49M | $38.28M |
| Holders | 14,209 | 70,287 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 1,293 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- PENDLE measures ~13× the market cap of DEBIT
- PENDLE measures ~2.9× the liquidity of DEBIT
- DEBIT measures ~42× the 24h volume of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~4.9× the holder count of DEBIT
- over the shared window DEBIT moved −10.9% while PENDLE moved −4.03%
What the data says
DEBIT
DEBIT — trading under the project name Teller on BNB Smart Chain, at 0x66661c7229901f568f16bd1551b3ba826f83ce49 — shows $1.2 million of liquidity and roughly $19.2 million of 24-hour volume in the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two things want separating here. The name: "Teller" is associated with a lending protocol that has operated across chains, and a DEBIT symbol on BSC is not automatically that project — the address above is the identity, and any claim of protocol lineage needs verifying at the contract, not the ticker. The numbers: near 7x daily turnover against liquidity is hot speculation by any standard, whatever the project behind it is.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $38.3 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $457.6 million market cap.
$3.4 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DEBIT or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: DEBIT (BNB Chain) measures $34.70M and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $457.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DEBIT or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: DEBIT (BNB Chain) grades C and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DEBIT and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show DEBIT at −10.9% and PENDLE at −4.03%.
More comparisons
DEBIT vs DORYH vs DEBITCTM vs DEBITDEBIT vs ALUSDPENDLE vs WBTCPENDLE vs GULDMSUSD vs PENDLEPOD vs PENDLE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.