HostDEBIT vs ALUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
DEBIT (BNB Chain) vs ALUSD (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
DEBIT vs ALUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| DEBIT | ALUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.01 | $0.9538 |
| Market cap | $34.70M | $9.99M |
| 24h volume | $49.89M | $1.92K |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $1.14M |
| FDV | $201.49M | $1.61M |
| Holders | 14,209 | 5,630 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 1,181 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- DEBIT measures ~3.5× the market cap of ALUSD
- DEBIT measures ~25,996× the 24h volume of ALUSD
- DEBIT measures ~2.5× the holder count of ALUSD
- over the shared window DEBIT moved −11.1% while ALUSD moved −0.24%
What the data says
DEBIT
DEBIT — trading under the project name Teller on BNB Smart Chain, at 0x66661c7229901f568f16bd1551b3ba826f83ce49 — shows $1.2 million of liquidity and roughly $19.2 million of 24-hour volume in the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two things want separating here. The name: "Teller" is associated with a lending protocol that has operated across chains, and a DEBIT symbol on BSC is not automatically that project — the address above is the identity, and any claim of protocol lineage needs verifying at the contract, not the ticker. The numbers: near 7x daily turnover against liquidity is hot speculation by any standard, whatever the project behind it is.
ALUSD
ALUSD at 0xcb8fa9a76b8e203d8c3797bf438d8fb81ea3326a is Alchemix's USD on Optimism — the dollar that backs the protocol's self-repaying loan structure, where deposited collateral's yield amortizes the borrow. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $10.0 million asset-wide market cap against a $1.6 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 1.7 million units — a small Optimism slice of a multi-chain stable.
The local book is deeper than it looks and quieter than it should be: $1.1 million of tracked depth reads deep against that float, while $1.9 thousand of 24-hour volume is a nearly dormant tape — the pool exists; the flow mostly does not. For an exit-sized holder that pairing is the real information: depth on paper, and a tape that rarely tests it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DEBIT or ALUSD?
By tracked market cap: DEBIT (BNB Chain) measures $34.70M and ALUSD (Optimism) measures $9.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DEBIT or ALUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: DEBIT (BNB Chain) grades C and ALUSD (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DEBIT and ALUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show DEBIT at −11.1% and ALUSD at −0.24%.
More comparisons
DEBIT vs DORYH vs DEBITCTM vs DEBITTBTC vs DEBITDORY vs ALUSDH vs ALUSDALUSD vs AKEALUSD vs CRED
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.