Host143 vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
143 (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
143 vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 143 | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003587 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $41.30K | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $513.70 | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $9.46K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $41.30K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 1,507 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 143 measures ~12× the market cap of MCA
- 143 measures ~4.1× the liquidity of MCA
- 143 measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of MCA
- MCA measures ~1.9× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window 143 moved 0.00% while MCA moved +9.69%
What the data says
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 143 or MCA?
By tracked market cap: 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 143 or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: 143 (Monad) grades A and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 143 and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 143 at 0.00% and MCA at +9.69%.
More comparisons
CUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143MCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.