HostWEETH vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
WEETH (Ethereum) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
WEETH vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WEETH | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.97K | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $5.89B | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $532.17K | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $14.39M | $9.46K |
| FDV | $5.89B | $41.30K |
| Holders | 28,590 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | 990 | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~142,587× the market cap of 143
- WEETH measures ~1,521× the liquidity of 143
- WEETH measures ~1,036× the 24h volume of 143
- WEETH measures ~19× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window WEETH moved −0.94% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $14.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WEETH or 143?
By tracked market cap: WEETH (Ethereum) measures $5.89B and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WEETH or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: WEETH (Ethereum) grades B and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WEETH and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WEETH at −0.94% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
WEETH vs UWEETH vs USDCWEETH vs AGXUSDE vs WEETHCUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143SAMO vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.