HostCUM vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
CUM (Solana) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
CUM vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CUM | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001511 | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $16.78K | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $43.37 | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $9.49K | $9.46K |
| FDV | $16.78K | $41.30K |
| Holders | 2,836 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | — | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 143 measures ~2.5× the market cap of CUM
- 143 measures ~12× the 24h volume of CUM
- CUM measures ~1.9× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window CUM moved +19.3% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
CUM
CUM — "cummunity" on Solana, mint oqU4DdYCbdSf9j74vnEgvCn1YzNfYQEPWaC6pu6pump — is a crude-name memecoin. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $17 thousand across 2,836 holders.
~$0.34 of daily volume on $9.5 thousand of liquidity — a dormant book; ~$5 of cap per wallet.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CUM or 143?
By tracked market cap: CUM (Solana) measures $16.78K and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CUM or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: CUM (Solana) grades A and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CUM and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CUM at +19.3% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
AQUARIUS vs CUMOIL vs CUMWEETH vs CUMSAMO vs CUMAQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143SAMO vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.