HostMCA vs SUSDE — price, size and safety, side by side
MCA (Monad) vs SUSDE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
MCA vs SUSDE — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| MCA | SUSDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000003199 | $1.26 |
| Market cap | $3.51K | $1.32B |
| 24h volume | $165.56 | $1.53M |
| Liquidity | $2.30K | $24.55M |
| FDV | $3.20K | $1.32B |
| Holders | 2,837 | 12,154 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 473 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- SUSDE measures ~376,031× the market cap of MCA
- SUSDE measures ~10,654× the liquidity of MCA
- SUSDE measures ~9,271× the 24h volume of MCA
- SUSDE measures ~4.3× the holder count of MCA
What the data says
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our September 27, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $24.5 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MCA or SUSDE?
By tracked market cap: MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K and SUSDE (Ethereum) measures $1.32B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MCA or SUSDE?
On the contract checks we publish: MCA (Monad) grades A and SUSDE (Ethereum) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MCA and SUSDE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show MCA at 0.00% and SUSDE at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCANFLXX vs MCASUSDE vs ETHFRXUSD vs SUSDESUSDE vs LINKSUSDE vs USD1
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.