HostNFLXX vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
NFLXX (Solana) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
NFLXX vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| NFLXX | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $71.97 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $110.51M | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $3.35K | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $2.46K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $110.51M | $3.20K |
| Holders | 3,556 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | — | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NFLXX measures ~31,484× the market cap of MCA
- NFLXX measures ~20× the 24h volume of MCA
What the data says
NFLXX
NFLXX is the xStock for Netflix — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper putting a claim on NFLX's price onto Solana rails. The mint XsEH7wWfJJu2ZT3UCFeVfALnVA6CP5ur7Ee11KmzVpL is what our scan tracks: $110.5 million market cap, $2 thousand of tracked pool liquidity, 3,556 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest caveat here is unusually stark: a nine-figure cap on a few thousand dollars of visible pool liquidity means essentially no secondary market in our tracked venues — the real liquidity lives on the issuer's mint/redeem rail and centralized venues, not in pools we can measure. Same xStock caveats as the rest of the line — issuer custody, off-hours gap risk — plus an exit-door so thin the cap number is mostly decorative.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NFLXX or MCA?
By tracked market cap: NFLXX (Solana) measures $110.51M and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NFLXX or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: NFLXX (Solana) grades A and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NFLXX and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show NFLXX at +0.83% and MCA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NFLXX vs ELIZAOSNFLXX vs STBUSDPT vs NFLXXPLAY vs NFLXXMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.