HostSTB vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
STB (Solana) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
STB vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| STB | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004483 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $208.43K | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $56.69 | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $2.41K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $208.43K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 3,852 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | — | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- STB measures ~59× the market cap of MCA
- MCA measures ~2.9× the 24h volume of STB
What the data says
STB
STB — "stabble" on Solana, mint STBuyENwJ1GP4yNZCjwavn92wYLEY3t5S1kVS5kwyS1 — is the token of stabble: a real Solana DEX — a stable-swap exchange that ran a genuine protocol — on a vanity "STBuy…" mint. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $208 thousand across 3,852 holders.
stabble is a legitimate DEX — its stable-swap pools were a real product — and a 474-million supply at $0.0004 on a 3.9k file is real-project distribution. ~$20 of daily volume on $2 thousand is a quiet book. Mint and freeze revoked.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STB or MCA?
By tracked market cap: STB (Solana) measures $208.43K and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STB or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: STB (Solana) grades A and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STB and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show STB at −0.53% and MCA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ELIZAOS vs STBNFLXX vs STBUSDPT vs STBSTB vs SUSDEMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROELIZAOS vs MCANFLXX vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.