NexXAUG vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side
XAUG (Base) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-07 / 2026-11-08.
XAUG vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-07T18:16:33
| XAUG | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.75K | $2.42 |
| Market cap | — | $1.37B |
| 24h volume | $8.01M DEX | $48.31M all venues |
| Liquidity | $268.03K | $230.93K |
| FDV | $12.71M | $726.37K |
| Holders | — | 6,579 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 335 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of XAUG
What the data says
XAUG
XAUG on Base — 0x08c5dd8b64ec620aa31914bba13984b57e40c30b — trades as "Lydia Gold" at $4,319.45, a price that tracks the spot ounce of gold almost exactly. Three days old in the November 4, 2026 snapshot: $268 thousand of liquidity, roughly $2.2 million of daily volume.
The XAU-prefixed ticker borrows the commodity code for gold, and the comparison it invites is XAUT — Tether's established tokenized gold. Lydia Gold is not that. The name, the price-pegging to spot, and the XAU prefix describe a commodity wrapper claim; whether any vaulted gold backs it is, as with every tokenized commodity, an off-chain question of issuer attestations that no pool figure can verify. The three-day age is the load-bearing fact: this is a brand-new instrument asking for commodity-grade trust.
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.4 billion market cap dwarfs the $726.4 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $230.9 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XAUG or ICP?
By tracked market cap: XAUG (Base) measures — and ICP (Base) measures $1.37B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XAUG or ICP?
On the contract checks we publish: XAUG (Base) grades B and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XAUG and ICP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-07T18:16:33, the measured snapshots show XAUG at −15.2% and ICP at −16.8%.
More comparisons
VIRTUAL vs XAUGXAUG vs SOLVBTCGOHOME vs XAUGXAUG vs UVMICP vs SOLVBTCICP vs UVMICP vs AAVE.EICP vs RENDER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-07T18:16:33; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.