HostUSDT0 vs QNT — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT0 (Mantle) vs QNT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-26.
USDT0 vs QNT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| USDT0 | QNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $192.58 |
| Market cap | $4.05B | $3.82B |
| 24h volume | $512.44K DEX | $1.78M DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.62M | $1.17M |
| FDV | $430.48M | $11.93B |
| Holders | — | 183,572 |
| Age (days) | 278 | 600 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT0 measures ~13× the liquidity of QNT
- QNT measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of USDT0
- over the shared window USDT0 moved +0.34% while QNT moved −18.6%
What the data says
USDT0
There's a small gap on this page — USDT0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USDT0 is showing thin liquidity of $14.62M and a maturing record at 278 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $14.62M of depth against a market cap of about $4.05B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USDT0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT0 or QNT?
By tracked market cap: USDT0 (Mantle) measures $4.05B and QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT0 or QNT?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT0 (Mantle) grades B and QNT (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT0 and QNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show USDT0 at +0.34% and QNT at −18.6%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs UUSDT0 vs XAUTUSDT0 vs USDGPEPE vs USDT0QNT vs TBTCONDO vs QNTQNT vs AKEQNT vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.