HostQNT vs TBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
QNT (Ethereum) vs TBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-26 / 2026-10-26.
QNT vs TBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| QNT | TBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $192.58 | $80.11K |
| Market cap | $3.82B | $358.59M |
| 24h volume | $1.78M DEX | $1.05M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.17M | $26.99M |
| FDV | $11.93B | $358.59M |
| Holders | 183,572 | 25,280 |
| Age (days) | 600 | 886 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~11× the market cap of TBTC
- TBTC measures ~23× the liquidity of QNT
- QNT measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of TBTC
- QNT measures ~7.3× the holder count of TBTC
- over the shared window QNT moved −26.8% while TBTC moved −7.53%
What the data says
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $27.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QNT or TBTC?
By tracked market cap: QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B and TBTC (Ethereum) measures $358.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QNT or TBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: QNT (Ethereum) grades B and TBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QNT and TBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show QNT at −26.8% and TBTC at −7.53%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs QNTONDO vs QNTQNT vs AKEQNT vs FFTBTC vs USD1TBTC vs SUSDETRUMP vs TBTCAERO vs TBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.