HostQNT vs AKE — price, size and safety, side by side
QNT (Ethereum) vs AKE (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-26 / 2026-10-26.
QNT vs AKE — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| QNT | AKE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $192.58 | $0.03011 |
| Market cap | $3.82B | $637.54M |
| 24h volume | $1.78M DEX | $2.90M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.17M | $943.71K |
| FDV | $11.93B | $2.80B |
| Holders | 183,572 | 43,061 |
| Age (days) | 600 | 415 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~6.0× the market cap of AKE
- AKE measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of QNT
- QNT measures ~4.3× the holder count of AKE
- over the shared window QNT moved −26.8% while AKE moved +2.36%
What the data says
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
AKE
AKE on BNB Smart Chain — 0x2c3a8ee94ddd97244a93bc48298f97d2c412f7db — is the elder of this index slice at roughly 13 months of tracked age, holding $944 thousand of liquidity in the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Age changes the read on everything else. A contract that has survived thirteen months of BSC trading has passed the window where most outright scam contracts die — but longevity is not vindication, and the roughly $18 million of 24-hour volume against $944 thousand of liquidity is the same hot-turnover signature seen across this cohort. Sustained high turnover on a mature token reads as an actively market-made asset: tradeable, and priced by flow rather than by fundamentals this snapshot can see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QNT or AKE?
By tracked market cap: QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B and AKE (BNB Chain) measures $637.54M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QNT or AKE?
On the contract checks we publish: QNT (Ethereum) grades B and AKE (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QNT and AKE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show QNT at −26.8% and AKE at +2.36%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs QNTQNT vs TBTCONDO vs QNTQNT vs FFAKE vs FFAKE vs USDC.ETBTC vs AKEAKE vs LBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.