HostQNT vs FF — price, size and safety, side by side
QNT (Ethereum) vs FF (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-26 / 2026-10-24.
QNT vs FF — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-24T21:16:06
| QNT | FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $192.58 | $0.0992 |
| Market cap | $3.82B | $402.44M |
| 24h volume | $1.78M DEX | $6.17M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.17M | $873.15K |
| FDV | $11.93B | $62.64M |
| Holders | 183,572 | 27,928 |
| Age (days) | 600 | 359 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~9.5× the market cap of FF
- FF measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of QNT
- QNT measures ~6.6× the holder count of FF
- over the shared window QNT moved −32.7% while FF moved −9.82%
What the data says
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FF
FF at 0xac23b90a79504865d52b49b327328411a23d4db2 — Falcon Finance — is a 359-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $402.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $62.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 488.7 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is loud: $873.1 thousand of tracked depth on $6.2 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool seven times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QNT or FF?
By tracked market cap: QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B and FF (BNB Chain) measures $402.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QNT or FF?
On the contract checks we publish: QNT (Ethereum) grades B and FF (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QNT and FF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-24T21:16:06, the measured snapshots show QNT at −32.7% and FF at −9.82%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs QNTQNT vs TBTCONDO vs QNTQNT vs AKEFF vs USDC.EAKE vs FFFF vs LBTCTBTC vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-24T21:16:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.