HostUSDT vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDT vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| USDT | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9994 | $8.47 |
| Market cap | $9.18B | $88.56M |
| 24h volume | $1.45B | $174.01K |
| Liquidity | $595.80M | $2.61M |
| FDV | $9.18B | $93.01M |
| Holders | 0 | 297,779 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 194 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~104× the market cap of GMX
- USDT measures ~228× the liquidity of GMX
- USDT measures ~8,342× the 24h volume of GMX
- over the shared window USDT moved −0.01% while GMX moved +5.49%
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $595.8 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or GMX?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.18B and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades C and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show USDT at −0.01% and GMX at +5.49%.
More comparisons
USDT vs USDCWBNB vs USDTUSDT vs USDCUSDT vs WETHGMX vs SYRUPUSDCGMX vs NVDABHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.