HostGMX vs NVDAB — price, size and safety, side by side
GMX (Arbitrum) vs NVDAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GMX vs NVDAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMX | NVDAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.47 | $224.84 |
| Market cap | $88.56M | $31.11M |
| 24h volume | $174.01K | $3.52M |
| Liquidity | $2.61M | $2.59M |
| FDV | $93.01M | $31.11M |
| Holders | 297,779 | 130,021 |
| Age (days) | 194 | 54 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- GMX measures ~2.8× the market cap of NVDAB
- NVDAB measures ~20× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~2.3× the holder count of NVDAB
What the data says
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
NVDAB
NVDAB at 0x02fca66c1d1afb4e2a7884261eb00f63598a7436 — deployed under the name "NVIDIA Corp" — is a BNB Chain asset 54 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $31.1 million market cap across a 138.4 thousand supply.
The borrowed equity name carries no affiliation by itself — the page's first job on a corporate-themed token is to say that plainly and print the address that actually identifies the contract. The book underneath is real: $2.6 million of deep tracked depth on $3.5 million of 24-hour volume, a tape that turns over more than the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMX or NVDAB?
By tracked market cap: GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M and NVDAB (BNB Chain) measures $31.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMX or NVDAB?
On the contract checks we publish: GMX (Arbitrum) grades D and NVDAB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMX and NVDAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMX at +4.16% and NVDAB at +0.04%.
More comparisons
GMX vs SYRUPUSDCHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMXUSDT vs GMXNVDAB vs TFUSDNVDAB vs USDXSYRUPUSDC vs NVDABNVDAB vs SHIB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.