HostGMX vs SYRUPUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
GMX (Arbitrum) vs SYRUPUSDC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GMX vs SYRUPUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| GMX | SYRUPUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.47 | $1.18 |
| Market cap | $88.56M | $98.76M |
| 24h volume | $174.01K | $481.98K |
| Liquidity | $2.61M | $11.21M |
| FDV | $93.01M | $98.76M |
| Holders | 297,779 | 3,757 |
| Age (days) | 194 | — |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- SYRUPUSDC measures ~4.3× the liquidity of GMX
- SYRUPUSDC measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~79× the holder count of SYRUPUSDC
- over the shared window GMX moved +5.49% while SYRUPUSDC moved +0.08%
What the data says
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
SYRUPUSDC
Syrup USDC on Solana is Maple Finance's yield-bearing dollar bridged to this chain — the deposit token that earns institutional lending yield while circulating as a stable unit, one of the "your stablecoin pays you" class. The mint AvZZF1YaZDziPY2RCK4oJrRVrbN3mTD9NL24hPeaZeUj is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $11.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: syrupUSDC's yield comes from Maple's lending book — real borrower demand paying real interest, which is a step up from incentive-printed yield — but it means the token's return is only as good as Maple's loan underwriting, and the bridged Solana form adds the bridge's custody between the holder and that book. The A grade covers the Solana contract state; the lending book is an off-chain fact.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMX or SYRUPUSDC?
By tracked market cap: GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) measures $98.76M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMX or SYRUPUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: GMX (Arbitrum) grades D and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMX and SYRUPUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show GMX at +5.49% and SYRUPUSDC at +0.08%.
More comparisons
GMX vs NVDABHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMXUSDT vs GMXSYRUPUSDC vs WETHSYRUPUSDC vs MEWSYRUPUSDC vs SKYSYRUPUSDC vs USDTB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.