HostUNI vs EXA — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs EXA (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
UNI vs EXA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UNI | EXA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.63 | $0.145 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $786.32K |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $1.92K |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $61.09K |
| FDV | $8.01B | $1.43M |
| Holders | 382,165 | 3,666 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 1,156 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~7,125× the market cap of EXA
- UNI measures ~418× the liquidity of EXA
- UNI measures ~2,679× the 24h volume of EXA
- UNI measures ~104× the holder count of EXA
- over the shared window UNI moved +6.71% while EXA moved −9.22%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
EXA
EXA at 0x1e925de1c68ef83bd98ee3e130ef14a50309c01b — deployed under the lowercase name "exactly" — is the Optimism deployment of the Exactly protocol's asset, 1,156 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $786.3 thousand market cap prices roughly half of the $1.4 million fully-diluted figure on 9.9 million units.
The book is deep for the small cap and the tape nearly still: $61.1 thousand of tracked depth on $1.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held float. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or EXA?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and EXA (Optimism) measures $786.32K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or EXA?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and EXA (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and EXA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UNI at +6.71% and EXA at −9.22%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDEEXA vs ETHFIEXA vs RDNTEXA vs 114514EXA vs GIKO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.