HostEXA vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side
EXA (Optimism) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
EXA vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| EXA | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.145 | $0.0004521 |
| Market cap | $786.32K | $688.76K |
| 24h volume | $1.92K | $1.39K |
| Liquidity | $61.09K | $61.05K |
| FDV | $1.43M | $459.55K |
| Holders | 3,666 | 101,322 |
| Age (days) | 1,156 | — |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- RDNT measures ~28× the holder count of EXA
What the data says
EXA
EXA at 0x1e925de1c68ef83bd98ee3e130ef14a50309c01b — deployed under the lowercase name "exactly" — is the Optimism deployment of the Exactly protocol's asset, 1,156 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $786.3 thousand market cap prices roughly half of the $1.4 million fully-diluted figure on 9.9 million units.
The book is deep for the small cap and the tape nearly still: $61.1 thousand of tracked depth on $1.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held float. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EXA or RDNT?
By tracked market cap: EXA (Optimism) measures $786.32K and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EXA or RDNT?
On the contract checks we publish: EXA (Optimism) grades B and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EXA and RDNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show EXA at −9.22% and RDNT at −5.68%.
More comparisons
EXA vs ETHFIEXA vs 114514EXA vs GIKOMIRA vs EXAETHFI vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKORDNT vs WCT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.