HostRDNT vs WCT — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs WCT (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
RDNT vs WCT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RDNT | WCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004521 | $0.04459 |
| Market cap | $688.76K | $19.10M |
| 24h volume | $1.39K | $3.09K |
| Liquidity | $61.05K | $60.66K |
| FDV | $459.55K | $41.44M |
| Holders | 101,322 | 133,677 |
| Age (days) | — | 620 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WCT measures ~28× the market cap of RDNT
- WCT measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of RDNT
- over the shared window RDNT moved −5.68% while WCT moved +5.47%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
WCT
WCT is the WalletConnect network’s token — the asset behind the wallet-to-app relay nearly every Ethereum user has scanned a QR code to reach — carrying staking, fees and governance for the connector layer. The deployment at 0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945 is its Optimism home.
Our September 21, 2026 snapshot reads a $19.1 million market cap ($41.4 million fully-diluted on 980.2 million tokens) across 133,677 holders — but only $60.7 thousand of tracked pool liquidity and $3.1 thousand traded in the last day. The 79.6% top-ten share says most of the float is still parked with the project.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or WCT?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K and WCT (Optimism) measures $19.10M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or WCT?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and WCT (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and WCT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −5.68% and WCT at +5.47%.
More comparisons
ETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKOWCT vs GRTGIKO vs WCT114514 vs WCTWCT vs 我的刀盾
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.