HostWCT vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
WCT (Optimism) vs GRT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
WCT vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WCT | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04459 | $0.0281 |
| Market cap | $19.10M | $307.50M |
| 24h volume | $3.09K | $30.30K |
| Liquidity | $60.66K | $60.60K |
| FDV | $41.44M | $94.73M |
| Holders | 133,677 | 119,699 |
| Age (days) | 620 | 1,325 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~16× the market cap of WCT
- GRT measures ~9.8× the 24h volume of WCT
- over the shared window WCT moved +5.47% while GRT moved +19.4%
What the data says
WCT
WCT is the WalletConnect network’s token — the asset behind the wallet-to-app relay nearly every Ethereum user has scanned a QR code to reach — carrying staking, fees and governance for the connector layer. The deployment at 0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945 is its Optimism home.
Our September 21, 2026 snapshot reads a $19.1 million market cap ($41.4 million fully-diluted on 980.2 million tokens) across 133,677 holders — but only $60.7 thousand of tracked pool liquidity and $3.1 thousand traded in the last day. The 79.6% top-ten share says most of the float is still parked with the project.
GRT
GRT at 0x9623063377ad1b27544c965ccd7342f7ea7e88c7 — Graph Token — is the Arbitrum deployment of The Graph protocol's indexing-work asset, 1,325 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $307.5 million market cap sits well above the $94.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 3.4 billion local units.
The local book is thin for the headline's scale: $60.6 thousand of tracked depth on $42.1 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice where the protocol's real settlement happens through indexer economics, not the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WCT or GRT?
By tracked market cap: WCT (Optimism) measures $19.10M and GRT (Arbitrum) measures $307.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WCT or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: WCT (Optimism) grades B and GRT (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WCT and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WCT at +5.47% and GRT at +19.4%.
More comparisons
GIKO vs WCT114514 vs WCTWCT vs 我的刀盾WCT vs GHOSTGRT vs 我的刀盾GRT vs GHOSTGIKO vs GRT114514 vs GRT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.