HostSWARM vs EAT — price, size and safety, side by side
SWARM (Solana) vs EAT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SWARM vs EAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| SWARM | EAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00007369 | $0.003904 |
| Market cap | $73.68K | $3.82M |
| 24h volume | $30.30 | $1.02K |
| Liquidity | $28.51K | $28.24K |
| FDV | $73.68K | $3.82M |
| Holders | 3,739 | 15,235 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EAT measures ~52× the market cap of SWARM
- EAT measures ~34× the 24h volume of SWARM
- EAT measures ~4.1× the holder count of SWARM
- over the shared window SWARM moved +19.9% while EAT moved −4.61%
What the data says
SWARM
SWARM — "Swarm" on Solana, mint JBSVUpKgYNHt4GLtNebQxTJmZgftTMWENQrziHtGpump — is a pump.fun file, holding 3,739 wallets on a $73.7 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked on a $23.3 thousand pool.
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWARM or EAT?
By tracked market cap: SWARM (Solana) measures $73.68K and EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWARM or EAT?
On the contract checks we publish: SWARM (Solana) grades A and EAT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWARM and EAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show SWARM at +19.9% and EAT at −4.61%.
More comparisons
LOOK vs SWARMSWARM vs QTOSWARM vs VIDAXUUSD vs SWARMEAT vs NOMEAT vs LOOBYEAT vs FEBUVIDAX vs EAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.