HostSUSDAI vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDAI (Arbitrum) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SUSDAI vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-21T09:07:20
| SUSDAI | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.11 | $0.0001022 |
| Market cap | $496.25M | $294.67K |
| 24h volume | $510.46K | $25.77M |
| Liquidity | $10.13M | $9.73M |
| FDV | $355.11M | $294.67K |
| Holders | 3,094 | 4,887 |
| Age (days) | 220 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SUSDAI measures ~1,684× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~50× the 24h volume of SUSDAI
- 牛来 measures ~1.6× the holder count of SUSDAI
What the data says
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $10.1 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDAI or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $496.25M and 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDAI or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDAI and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-21T09:07:20, the measured snapshots show SUSDAI at +0.29% and 牛来 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSDAI vs WETHCRV vs SUSDAIUSDTB vs SUSDAISUSDAI vs 牛来牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-21T09:07:20; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.