HostCRV vs SUSDAI — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs SUSDAI (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CRV vs SUSDAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| CRV | SUSDAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3436 | $1.11 |
| Market cap | $539.21M | $496.25M |
| 24h volume | $633.85K | $510.46K |
| Liquidity | $10.48M | $10.13M |
| FDV | $831.96M | $355.11M |
| Holders | 100,872 | 3,094 |
| Age (days) | — | 220 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~33× the holder count of SUSDAI
What the data says
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $10.1 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or SUSDAI?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M and SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $496.25M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or SUSDAI?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and SUSDAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show CRV at 0.00% and SUSDAI at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs WETHSUSDAI vs WETHUSDTB vs SUSDAISUSDAI vs 牛来SUSDAI vs 牛来
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.