Host牛来 vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
牛来 vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 牛来 | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001019 | $0.0001022 |
| Market cap | — | $294.67K |
| 24h volume | $27.03M | $25.77M |
| Liquidity | $9.74M | $9.73M |
| FDV | — | $294.67K |
| Holders | 5,089 | 4,887 |
| Age (days) | 1 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x688bd92e92a44ae7ad75016506b053fe5cfa8b07 — is one of three contracts this index tracks sharing the same Chinese name (roughly "the bull is coming"). This address carries the deepest of the three: $9.7 million of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The family resemblance is the story. Three tokens, one name, one chain, all priced within a fraction of a cent of each other at ~$0.0001, all cycling ~$26 million of daily volume — near-identical metrics across distinct contracts is the signature of a coordinated deployment or shared market-making arrangement, not three independent projects that happened to converge. The address above is the only identity; a buyer chasing "the" 牛来 by name alone has a one-in-three chance of landing on a different contract.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures — and 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and 牛来 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来牛来 vs TRUSD牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来牛来 vs TRUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.