Host牛来 vs TRUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs TRUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
牛来 vs TRUSD — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 牛来 | TRUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001019 | $0.9987 |
| Market cap | — | $72.95M |
| 24h volume | $27.03M | $692.53K |
| Liquidity | $9.74M | $9.45M |
| FDV | — | $72.95M |
| Holders | 5,089 | 470 |
| Age (days) | 1 | 25 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~39× the 24h volume of TRUSD
- 牛来 measures ~11× the holder count of TRUSD
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x688bd92e92a44ae7ad75016506b053fe5cfa8b07 — is one of three contracts this index tracks sharing the same Chinese name (roughly "the bull is coming"). This address carries the deepest of the three: $9.7 million of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The family resemblance is the story. Three tokens, one name, one chain, all priced within a fraction of a cent of each other at ~$0.0001, all cycling ~$26 million of daily volume — near-identical metrics across distinct contracts is the signature of a coordinated deployment or shared market-making arrangement, not three independent projects that happened to converge. The address above is the only identity; a buyer chasing "the" 牛来 by name alone has a one-in-three chance of landing on a different contract.
TRUSD
trUSD is a smaller fiat-backed dollar — the stablecoin of a modest issuer in a field where the top three names control almost everything. The deployment 0xd0580192e98ea6ceb9c7b6191ed2e27560911697 is the Ethereum mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $9.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing for a small stable is different than for a small token: a stablecoin's entire product is trust — attestations, redemption rails, reserve quality — and scale is how that trust gets battle-tested. trUSD's depth is real but the asset class it competes in is one where the incumbents' attestations have been inspected for years and a minor issuer's haven't.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or TRUSD?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures — and TRUSD (Ethereum) measures $72.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or TRUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and TRUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and TRUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and TRUSD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来USDC vs TRUSDOPENAI vs TRUSD牛来 vs TRUSDWETH vs TRUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.