Host牛来 vs TRUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs TRUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
牛来 vs TRUSD — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| 牛来 | TRUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001022 | $0.9987 |
| Market cap | $294.67K | $72.95M |
| 24h volume | $25.77M | $692.53K |
| Liquidity | $9.73M | $9.45M |
| FDV | $294.67K | $72.95M |
| Holders | 4,887 | 470 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 25 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- TRUSD measures ~248× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~37× the 24h volume of TRUSD
- 牛来 measures ~10× the holder count of TRUSD
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
TRUSD
trUSD is a smaller fiat-backed dollar — the stablecoin of a modest issuer in a field where the top three names control almost everything. The deployment 0xd0580192e98ea6ceb9c7b6191ed2e27560911697 is the Ethereum mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $9.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing for a small stable is different than for a small token: a stablecoin's entire product is trust — attestations, redemption rails, reserve quality — and scale is how that trust gets battle-tested. trUSD's depth is real but the asset class it competes in is one where the incumbents' attestations have been inspected for years and a minor issuer's haven't.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or TRUSD?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K and TRUSD (Ethereum) measures $72.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or TRUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and TRUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and TRUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and TRUSD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来USDC vs TRUSDOPENAI vs TRUSD牛来 vs TRUSDWETH vs TRUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.