Host牛来 vs USDC — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs USDC (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
牛来 vs USDC — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| 牛来 | USDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001022 | $0.7631 |
| Market cap | $294.67K | $11 |
| 24h volume | $25.77M | $126.92M |
| Liquidity | $9.73M | $1.38B |
| FDV | $294.67K | $38.16B |
| Holders | 4,887 | 2,778 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 262 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~26,788× the market cap of USDC
- USDC measures ~142× the liquidity of 牛来
- USDC measures ~4.9× the 24h volume of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~1.8× the holder count of USDC
- over the shared window 牛来 moved 0.00% while USDC moved −17.9%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
USDC
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on USDC to flag. The mint and freeze levers on USDC's contract is still live as of 2026-09-27, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. Until that changes, USDC stays around 37/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where USDC stands today: $1.38B of on-chain liquidity, 2,778 wallets holding and 262 days old as of 2026-09-27. Against roughly $11 in market cap, the $1.38B of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 2,778-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Treat the creator's holdings as the headline risk: 72.5% of USDC's supply sits in the deployer's wallet as of 2026-09-27, well past the 'no single holder over 5%' line the scanners use.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or USDC?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K and USDC (BNB Chain) measures $11 — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or USDC?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and USDC (BNB Chain) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and USDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and USDC at −17.9%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAIWETH vs 牛来牛来 vs TRUSDCCV vs USDCRDK vs USDCUSDC vs SOLUSDC vs WETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.