Open app

SURPLUS vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side

SURPLUS (Base) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.

SURPLUSB

$0.00007181
Surplus Intelligence on Base
Trade SURPLUS
vs

龙虾A

$0.1034
龙虾 on BNB Chain
Trade 龙虾

SURPLUS vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
SURPLUS −32.9%  ·  龙虾 −60.1% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
SURPLUS龙虾
Price$0.00007181$0.1034
Market cap$10.70M$255.30M
24h volume$912.43K$6.84M
Liquidity$2.51M$2.46M
FDV$10.70M$255.30M
Holders6,65190,082
Age (days)128206
Safety gradeBA

Where they differ

What the data says

SURPLUS

SURPLUS at 0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 — styled Surplus Intelligence — is a young Base asset just 128 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $10.7 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.

What separates this row from the average young Base book is the pool: $2.5 million of tracked depth is deep relative to a $10.7 million cap — nearly a quarter of the valuation is matched by the exit book — on $912.4 thousand of 24-hour volume, an unusually busy tape for the age. The contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.

Full SURPLUS safety read →

龙虾

The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.

The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full 龙虾 safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, SURPLUS or 龙虾?

By tracked market cap: SURPLUS (Base) measures $10.70M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, SURPLUS or 龙虾?

On the contract checks we publish: SURPLUS (Base) grades B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have SURPLUS and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SURPLUS at −32.9% and 龙虾 at −60.1%.

More comparisons

ADI vs SURPLUSSHIB vs SURPLUSUSDX vs SURPLUSTFUSD vs SURPLUS龙虾 vs SKHY龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAXADI vs 龙虾

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.