Host龙虾 vs SAVAX — price, size and safety, side by side
龙虾 (BNB Chain) vs SAVAX (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
龙虾 vs SAVAX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 龙虾 | SAVAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1034 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $255.30M | $259.05M |
| 24h volume | $6.84M | $505.15K |
| Liquidity | $2.46M | $2.40M |
| FDV | $255.30M | $259.03M |
| Holders | 90,082 | 68,602 |
| Age (days) | 206 | 340 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~14× the 24h volume of SAVAX
- over the shared window 龙虾 moved −60.1% while SAVAX moved −4.12%
What the data says
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SAVAX
SAVAX at 0x2b2c81e08f1af8835a78bb2a90ae924ace0ea4be is BENQI's liquid-staked AVAX — the receipt that lets a staked AVAX position keep moving through C-Chain DeFi while the underlying deposit earns staking yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the float at a $259.0 million market cap across 18.1 million receipt units.
Tracked pool depth of $2.4 million reads thin against that cap, on $514.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — the standard silhouette for a liquid-staking token, whose real exit path is protocol redemption and aggregator routing rather than one static pool a scanner can quote. The deployment is 340 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 龙虾 or SAVAX?
By tracked market cap: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M and SAVAX (Avalanche) measures $259.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 龙虾 or SAVAX?
On the contract checks we publish: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A and SAVAX (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 龙虾 and SAVAX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 龙虾 at −60.1% and SAVAX at −4.12%.
More comparisons
龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETHADI vs 龙虾SAVAX vs METAVALETH vs SAVAXSAVAX vs CBBTCSAVAX vs MELANIA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.