HostADI vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
ADI (Ethereum) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ADI vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ADI | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.09 | $0.1034 |
| Market cap | $77.79M | $255.30M |
| 24h volume | $944.99K | $6.84M |
| Liquidity | $2.53M | $2.46M |
| FDV | $8.25B | $255.30M |
| Holders | 21,614 | 90,082 |
| Age (days) | 263 | 206 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~3.3× the market cap of ADI
- 龙虾 measures ~7.2× the 24h volume of ADI
- 龙虾 measures ~4.2× the holder count of ADI
- over the shared window ADI moved +3.37% while 龙虾 moved −60.1%
What the data says
ADI
ADI is a small-cap token our scan tracks at contract 0x8b1484d57abbe239bb280661377363b03c89caea — the September 26, 2026 snapshot shows $2.5 million of pool liquidity, respectable depth for its cohort.
The honest note: single-name tokens at this size live or die on a thin set of facts — who issues it, what accrues to it, and whether the liquidity is locked or one withdrawal away from gone. Verify those three before anything else; pool depth alone says nothing about permanence.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ADI or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: ADI (Ethereum) measures $77.79M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ADI or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: ADI (Ethereum) grades B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ADI and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ADI at +3.37% and 龙虾 at −60.1%.
More comparisons
SHIB vs ADIADI vs SURPLUSUSDX vs ADITFUSD vs ADI龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.