HostSHIB vs SURPLUS — price, size and safety, side by side
SHIB (Ethereum) vs SURPLUS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SHIB vs SURPLUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SHIB | SURPLUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000005899 | $0.00007181 |
| Market cap | $3.48B | $10.70M |
| 24h volume | $113.09K | $912.43K |
| Liquidity | $2.53M | $2.51M |
| FDV | $5.90B | $10.70M |
| Holders | 1,698,499 | 6,651 |
| Age (days) | — | 128 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SHIB measures ~325× the market cap of SURPLUS
- SURPLUS measures ~8.1× the 24h volume of SHIB
- SHIB measures ~255× the holder count of SURPLUS
- over the shared window SHIB moved +4.33% while SURPLUS moved −32.9%
What the data says
SHIB
SHIBA INU at 0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce is the original self-styled dogecoin killer on Ethereum and one of the widest-held tokens anywhere: 1,698,499 wallets at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. This page's job is less to explain a meme than to read a very large, very old market structure honestly.
The contract side is as clean as a token gets: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, the source is verified, and it sits on a major security registry's trust list. The creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply. The honest caveat is market-side, not contract-side: $2.5 million of tracked liquidity against a $3.5 billion market cap is large in dollars but thin against the token's own size — size an exit against the pool, not the cap. The ten largest wallets hold about 64% of supply, heavy even for a top-cap meme.
SURPLUS
SURPLUS at 0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 — styled Surplus Intelligence — is a young Base asset just 128 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $10.7 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
What separates this row from the average young Base book is the pool: $2.5 million of tracked depth is deep relative to a $10.7 million cap — nearly a quarter of the valuation is matched by the exit book — on $912.4 thousand of 24-hour volume, an unusually busy tape for the age. The contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHIB or SURPLUS?
By tracked market cap: SHIB (Ethereum) measures $3.48B and SURPLUS (Base) measures $10.70M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHIB or SURPLUS?
On the contract checks we publish: SHIB (Ethereum) grades A and SURPLUS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHIB and SURPLUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SHIB at +4.33% and SURPLUS at −32.9%.
More comparisons
SHIB vs ADIUSDX vs SHIBTFUSD vs SHIBNVDAB vs SHIBADI vs SURPLUSSURPLUS vs 龙虾USDX vs SURPLUSTFUSD vs SURPLUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.