HostSQD vs WOO — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs WOO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SQD vs WOO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SQD | WOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03036 | $0.0121 |
| Market cap | $39.68M | $25.14M |
| 24h volume | $3.38K | $845.49K |
| Liquidity | $226.13K | $593.54K |
| FDV | $40.29M | $25.14M |
| Holders | 17,095 | 19,358 |
| Age (days) | 809 | 374 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- SQD measures ~1.6× the market cap of WOO
- WOO measures ~2.6× the liquidity of SQD
- WOO measures ~250× the 24h volume of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved +9.76% while WOO moved 0.00%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $594 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or WOO?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M and WOO (Ethereum) measures $25.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or WOO?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and WOO (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and WOO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SQD at +9.76% and WOO at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEAMSETH vs WOOWOO vs LABCOLLECT vs WOOAAPLX vs WOO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.