HostUNIBTC vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
UNIBTC (Optimism) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UNIBTC vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| UNIBTC | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $83.55K | $0.03036 |
| Market cap | $249.10M | $39.68M |
| 24h volume | $208.86 | $3.38K |
| Liquidity | $226.27K | $226.13K |
| FDV | $331.21K | $40.29M |
| Holders | 69,878 | 17,095 |
| Age (days) | 802 | 809 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- UNIBTC measures ~6.3× the market cap of SQD
- SQD measures ~16× the 24h volume of UNIBTC
- UNIBTC measures ~4.1× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window UNIBTC moved −0.66% while SQD moved +9.22%
What the data says
UNIBTC
uniBTC at 0x93919784c523f39cacaa98ee0a9d96c3f32b593e is a bitcoin-denominated receipt on Optimism, 802 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $249.1 million market cap dwarfs a $331.2 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 4 local units — four coins' worth on this chain.
The local book is thin against the headline: $226.3 thousand of tracked depth on $10.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a sliver that mostly sits. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNIBTC or SQD?
By tracked market cap: UNIBTC (Optimism) measures $249.10M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNIBTC or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: UNIBTC (Optimism) grades B and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNIBTC and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show UNIBTC at −0.66% and SQD at +9.22%.
More comparisons
LASO vs UNIBTCUNIBTC vs CRVOPG vs UNIBTCUNIBTC vs RHEALASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEAOPG vs SQD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.