HostLASO vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
LASO (Solana) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LASO vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| LASO | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1434 | $0.03036 |
| Market cap | $2.96M | $39.68M |
| 24h volume | $11.56K | $3.38K |
| Liquidity | $226.71K | $226.13K |
| FDV | $2.96M | $40.29M |
| Holders | 420 | 17,095 |
| Age (days) | — | 809 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- SQD measures ~13× the market cap of LASO
- LASO measures ~3.4× the 24h volume of SQD
- SQD measures ~41× the holder count of LASO
- over the shared window LASO moved +65.9% while SQD moved +9.22%
What the data says
LASO
LASO is the token of Laso Finance — a Solana project launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system (the vanity mint suffix). The mint LASocYgQAo8GfypSjedNQgLft8y8DVGg1kSqR3smeta is what our scan tracks: $3.0 million market cap, $227 thousand of liquidity and 420 holders as of September 26, 2026 — graded B.
The honest shape: MetaDAO-launched tokens get governance-by-prediction-market for free and a concentrated early holder base with it — four hundred holders is the thinnest crowd in this batch. The pool is deep relative to cap, so trading works; the crowd deciding its direction is small. That is the governance experiment's honest trade-off.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LASO or SQD?
By tracked market cap: LASO (Solana) measures $2.96M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LASO or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: LASO (Solana) grades B and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LASO and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show LASO at +65.9% and SQD at +9.22%.
More comparisons
LASO vs UNIBTCOPG vs LASOLASO vs CRVLASO vs RHEAUNIBTC vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEAOPG vs SQD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.