Open app

WOO vs LAB — price, size and safety, side by side

WOO (Ethereum) vs LAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.

WOOA

$0.0121
Wootrade Network on Ethereum
Trade WOO
vs

LABA

$0.06048
LAB on BNB Chain
Trade LAB

WOO vs LAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
WOO +11.1%  ·  LAB +12.8% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
WOOLAB
Price$0.0121$0.06048
Market cap$25.14M$41.44M
24h volume$845.49K$1.69M
Liquidity$593.54K$590.43K
FDV$25.14M$53.09M
Holders19,35833,502
Age (days)374343
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

WOO

WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $594 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.

The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.

Full WOO safety read →

LAB

LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.

The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.

Full LAB safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, WOO or LAB?

By tracked market cap: WOO (Ethereum) measures $25.14M and LAB (BNB Chain) measures $41.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, WOO or LAB?

On the contract checks we publish: WOO (Ethereum) grades A and LAB (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have WOO and LAB performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WOO at +11.1% and LAB at +12.8%.

More comparisons

MSETH vs WOOCOLLECT vs WOOAAPLX vs WOODOGE vs WOOMSETH vs LABLAB vs DAICOLLECT vs LABAAPLX vs LAB

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.