HostCOLLECT vs LAB — price, size and safety, side by side
COLLECT (BNB Chain) vs LAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
COLLECT vs LAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| COLLECT | LAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01945 | $0.06048 |
| Market cap | $9.08M | $41.44M |
| 24h volume | $1.20M | $1.69M |
| Liquidity | $600.56K | $590.43K |
| FDV | $50.75M | $53.09M |
| Holders | 52,348 | 33,502 |
| Age (days) | 269 | 343 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LAB measures ~4.6× the market cap of COLLECT
- COLLECT measures ~1.6× the holder count of LAB
What the data says
COLLECT
COLLECT at 0x4b3d30992f003c8167699735f5ab2831b2a087d3 — deployed under the name "Collect on Fanable" — is a 269-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $9.1 million market cap against a $50.7 million fully-diluted figure on 3.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep for the float and the tape is working: $600.6 thousand of tracked depth on $1.2 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
LAB
LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COLLECT or LAB?
By tracked market cap: COLLECT (BNB Chain) measures $9.08M and LAB (BNB Chain) measures $41.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COLLECT or LAB?
On the contract checks we publish: COLLECT (BNB Chain) grades A and LAB (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COLLECT and LAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show COLLECT at +15.0% and LAB at +12.8%.
More comparisons
AAPLX vs COLLECTDOGE vs COLLECTCOLLECT vs MSETHCP vs COLLECTWOO vs LABMSETH vs LABLAB vs DAIAAPLX vs LAB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.