HostMSETH vs LAB — price, size and safety, side by side
MSETH (Base) vs LAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MSETH vs LAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MSETH | LAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.38K | $0.06048 |
| Market cap | $50.91M | $41.44M |
| 24h volume | $1.25M | $1.69M |
| Liquidity | $2.80M | $590.43K |
| FDV | $22.10M | $53.09M |
| Holders | 6,068 | 33,502 |
| Age (days) | 501 | 343 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MSETH measures ~4.7× the liquidity of LAB
- LAB measures ~5.5× the holder count of MSETH
- over the shared window MSETH moved +0.01% while LAB moved +12.8%
What the data says
MSETH
msETH is Metronome Synth's synthetic ether — a collateral-minted synthetic that tracks ETH's price through the Synth engine's mint-and-pool mechanics rather than by holding ether itself. The contract 0x7ba6f01772924a82d9626c126347a28299e98c98 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $2.8 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest note: msETH is not ETH and not a claim on ETH — synthetic assets trade at whatever the pool clears, which can sit far from the underlying's price (our current read has it at a steep discount to spot ether). Exposure through a synth is exposure to the synth's own liquidity and redemption mechanics first. If you want ETH on Base, bridged or wrapped ETH is the honest instrument; this is a different product.
LAB
LAB at 0x7ec43cf65f1663f820427c62a5780b8f2e25593a is a BNB Chain token 343 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, carrying 33,502 holders around a $41.4 million market cap — with a $53.1 million fully-diluted figure on 990.0 million units showing the supply still ahead.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. Distribution is the counterweight worth pricing: the ten largest wallets hold 62.8% of supply, a top-weighted bracket on an otherwise broad holder book. $590.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over well beyond the pool, the signature of an actively routed asset.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MSETH or LAB?
By tracked market cap: MSETH (Base) measures $50.91M and LAB (BNB Chain) measures $41.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MSETH or LAB?
On the contract checks we publish: MSETH (Base) grades B and LAB (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MSETH and LAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MSETH at +0.01% and LAB at +12.8%.
More comparisons
SOL vs MSETHAUSD vs MSETHUB vs MSETHNPC vs MSETHWOO vs LABLAB vs DAICOLLECT vs LABAAPLX vs LAB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.