HostSHRAMP vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SHRAMP vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SHRAMP | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002294 | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $159.06K | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $984.90 | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $17.43K | $9.46K |
| FDV | $159.06K | $41.30K |
| Holders | 3,228 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | 291 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~3.9× the market cap of 143
- SHRAMP measures ~1.8× the liquidity of 143
- SHRAMP measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of 143
- SHRAMP measures ~2.1× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved +44.2% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or 143?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at +44.2% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
SHRAMP vs LENNYRMDN vs SHRAMPARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMPCUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.