HostRMDN vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
RMDN (Solana) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
RMDN vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RMDN | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000484 | $0.0002294 |
| Market cap | $48.43K | $159.06K |
| 24h volume | $838.60 | $984.90 |
| Liquidity | $17.46K | $17.43K |
| FDV | $48.43K | $159.06K |
| Holders | 9,358 | 3,228 |
| Age (days) | — | 291 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~3.3× the market cap of RMDN
- RMDN measures ~2.9× the holder count of SHRAMP
- over the shared window RMDN moved −7.82% while SHRAMP moved +44.2%
What the data says
RMDN
RMDN — "Ramadan" on Solana, mint 6TC3Nj94aEFK7ZzZ5QWUk29aUeym4TQYcqntW4z8Q88x — is a religious-calendar token: Ramadan-themed, aimed at the two-billion-person observance window. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $48 thousand across 9,358 holders — on a −6.7% day.
Holiday tokens are cyclical assets — they run in the weeks before the observance and fade after Eid — and a 9,358-wallet file shows the theme's distribution reach. ~$817 of daily volume on $17 thousand is a quiet book out of season. Mint and freeze revoked.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RMDN or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: RMDN (Solana) measures $48.43K and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RMDN or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: RMDN (Solana) grades A and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RMDN and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RMDN at −7.82% and SHRAMP at +44.2%.
More comparisons
ARIA vs RMDNRMDN vs LENNYSLEAZE vs RMDNCATGF vs RMDNSHRAMP vs LENNYARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMPCATGF vs SHRAMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.