HostSHIB vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
SHIB (Ethereum) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SHIB vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SHIB | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000005899 | $0.1034 |
| Market cap | $3.48B | $255.30M |
| 24h volume | $113.09K | $6.84M |
| Liquidity | $2.53M | $2.46M |
| FDV | $5.90B | $255.30M |
| Holders | 1,698,499 | 90,082 |
| Age (days) | — | 206 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHIB measures ~14× the market cap of 龙虾
- 龙虾 measures ~60× the 24h volume of SHIB
- SHIB measures ~19× the holder count of 龙虾
- over the shared window SHIB moved +4.33% while 龙虾 moved −60.1%
What the data says
SHIB
SHIBA INU at 0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce is the original self-styled dogecoin killer on Ethereum and one of the widest-held tokens anywhere: 1,698,499 wallets at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. This page's job is less to explain a meme than to read a very large, very old market structure honestly.
The contract side is as clean as a token gets: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, the source is verified, and it sits on a major security registry's trust list. The creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply. The honest caveat is market-side, not contract-side: $2.5 million of tracked liquidity against a $3.5 billion market cap is large in dollars but thin against the token's own size — size an exit against the pool, not the cap. The ten largest wallets hold about 64% of supply, heavy even for a top-cap meme.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHIB or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: SHIB (Ethereum) measures $3.48B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHIB or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: SHIB (Ethereum) grades A and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHIB and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SHIB at +4.33% and 龙虾 at −60.1%.
More comparisons
SHIB vs ADISHIB vs SURPLUSUSDX vs SHIBTFUSD vs SHIB龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.